Machine Learning Vs. Statistics - Edvancer Eduventures

Machine Learning Vs. Statistics

Many people have this doubt, what’s the difference between statistics and machine learning? Is there something like machine learning vs. statistics?

From a traditional data analytics standpoint, the answer to the above question is simple.

  • Machine Learning is an algorithm that can learn from data without relying on rules-based programming.
  • Statistical modeling is a formalization of relationships between variables in the data in the form of mathematical equations.

Machine learning is all about predictions, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, etc.

Statistics is about sample, population, hypothesis, etc.

Two different critters, right? Well, let’s see if they are actually that different!

Both machine learning and statistics have the same objective

According to Larry Wasserman,

They are both concerned with the same question: how do we learn from data?” In his blog, he states how the same concepts have different names in the two fields,

Statistics Machine learning
Estimation ~ Learning
Classifier ~ Hypothesis
Data Point ~ Example/ Instance
Regression ~ Supervised Learning
Classification ~ Supervised Learning
Covariate ~ Feature
Response ~ Label

Robert Tibshirani, a statistician and machine learning expert at Stanford, calls machine learning “glorified statistics”.

Nowadays, both machine learning and statistics techniques are used in pattern recognition, knowledge discovery and data mining.  The two fields are converging more and more even though the below figure may show them as almost exclusive.

Machine Learning vs. Statistics

Source: SAS Institute; A Venn diagram that shows how machine learning and statistics are related

Both machine learning and statistics share the same goal:  Learning from data. Both these methods focus on drawing knowledge or insights from the data. But, their methods are affected by their inherent cultural differences.

They’re related, sure. But their parents are different.

Machine learning is a subfield of computer science and artificial intelligence. It deals with building systems that can learn from data, instead of explicitly programmed instructions.

statistical model, on the other hand, is a subfield of mathematics.

Machine learning is comparatively a new field.

Cheap computing power and availability of large amounts of data allowed data scientists to train computers to learn by analyzing data. But, statistical modeling existed long before computers were invented.

Methodological differences between machine learning and statistics

The difference between the two is that machine learning emphasizes optimization and performance over inference which is what statistics is concerned about.

This is how a statistician and machine learning practitioner will describe the outcome of the same model:

ML professional: “The model is 85% accurate in predicting Y, given a, b and c.”

Statistician: “The model is 85% accurate in predicting Y, given a, b and c; and I am 90% certain that you will obtain the same result.”

Machine learning requires no prior assumptions about the underlying relationships between the variables. You just have to throw in all the data you have, and the algorithm processes the data and discovers patterns, using which you can make predictions on the new data set. Machine learning treats an algorithm like a black box, as long it works. It is generally applied to high dimensional data sets, the more data you have, the more accurate your prediction is.

In contrast, statisticians must understand how the data was collected, statistical properties of the estimator (p-value, unbiased estimators), the underlying distribution of the population they are studying and the kinds of properties you would expect if you did the experiment many times. You need to know precisely what you are doing and come up with parameters that will provide the predictive power. Statistical modeling techniques are usually applied to low dimensional data sets.


It may seem like machine learning and statistical modeling are two different branches of predictive modeling. The difference between the two has reduced significantly over the past decade. Both the branches have learned from each other a lot and will continue to come closer together in the future.

But, understanding the association and knowing their differences enables machine learners and statisticians to expand their knowledge and even apply methods outside their domain of expertise. This is the notion of “data science” itself, which aims to bridge the gap. Collaboration and communication between these two fascinating data-driven disciplines allows us to make better decisions that will ultimately positively affect the way we live.

You can learn some machine learning techniques which are based on statistics in our Certified Business Analytics Professional course

Aatash Shah

CEO at Edvancer
Aatash is the co-founder and CEO of Edvancer Eduventures. He has over 6 years of experience in the investment banking industry before starting Edvancer. He started his career with ICICI Bank and then went on to work with global investment banks Lehman Brothers and Nomura Securities as a Vice-President analyzing equity investments for clients across the globe. He is a post-graduate in management from IIM Lucknow and is also a BE in Electronics Engineering from Mumbai University.
Aatash is passionate about combining education with technology to create a new paradigm of learning which is relevant, timely, cost-effective and focused on fulfilling the end goal of education, which is meeting the needs of the employers.
Share this on

Follow us on


  • Difference between Machine Learning, Data Science, AI, Deep Learning, and Statistics – Browse your web

    […] This article tries to answer the question. The author writes that statistics is machine learning with confidence intervals for the quantities being predicted or estimated. I tend to disagree, as I have built engineer-friendly confidence intervals that don't require any mathematical or statistical knowledge. […]

  • Sreenivas BT

    I largely subscribe to this thinking – in a way for me, it is being more methodical vs being empirical. More check points vs decision making and moving forward to find a workable solution

    As a analytics professional, machine learning may bring in more excitement but you never where you are stumped……at the same time, going purely by rules (statistics) may not help you to narrow down on a solution for your client

  • Machine Learning vs Statistics – Use-R!Use-R!

    […] Original. Reposted with permission. […]